行业知识 · v2.3.0 · 资料核对 2026-10-03
Practice and Question Routing
Diagnostic prompts by gap
| Gap | Primary exercise | Follow-up challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Product discovery | reconstruct a recent workflow and baseline | prove the request is not just a solution idea |
| AI fit | compare process, rule, ML, LLM, and human | define stop criteria for the AI experiment |
| PRD | write behavior contract and failure states | trace requirements to evaluation and operations |
| RAG | diagnose a wrong answer layer by layer | design permission and freshness tests |
| Agent | choose autonomy level and tools | handle loop, duplicate action, and rollback |
| Evaluation | build a stratified 50-case starter set | calibrate judge and analyze severe tails |
| Project | create phase-gated WBS and RAID | recover a two-week delay through explicit tradeoffs |
| Safety | threat-model data and actions | respond to a cross-tenant leak in 30 minutes |
| Business | calculate value and successful-task cost | choose pricing and test a moat claim |
| Leadership | write a decision memo with dissent | stop a politically supported project using evidence |
Answer structure
Train answers to follow:
- Clarify user, goal, scope, risk, and decision.
- State current baseline and available evidence.
- Present options, including simpler alternatives.
- Make a choice and explain tradeoffs.
- Define metrics, failure modes, and safeguards.
- Explain experiment, rollout, ownership, and stop/rollback.
Avoid forcing this into a rigid script when the question is narrow; preserve the decision logic.
Follow-up ladder
Use increasingly difficult follow-ups:
- What evidence supports that?
- What is the non-AI baseline?
- Which assumption is most likely false?
- What happens in the worst 1% of cases?
- Who is authorized to make or reverse the decision?
- How will you test this before building everything?
- What would make you stop?
- How do cost and operations change at 100× scale?
- How would a strong competitor copy this?
- What mechanism prevents the same mistake next quarter?
Practice modes
Rapid oral drill
Give 2 minutes to structure and 3 minutes to answer. Score clarity, breadth, evidence, and closure. Repeat weak questions after 2–3 days.
Written case
Give 30–60 minutes. Require one-page decision plus product/evaluation/project appendix. Score the artifact before giving a model answer.
Artifact red-team
Review an existing PRD or plan. Identify missing evidence, invalid assumptions, untested failure modes, unclear ownership, and absent rollback. Require the learner to revise.
Simulation
Introduce a changed constraint: vendor price increase, privacy incident, delayed data, model regression, executive deadline, or low adoption. Evaluate adaptation without hiding tradeoffs.
Portfolio evidence
Require artifacts with sanitized context, personal contribution, decisions, alternatives, metrics, failures, learning, and outcome. Distinguish real work from synthetic practice. Never fabricate impact numbers or employer details.
Feedback style
Lead with the highest-impact gap. Cite the exact answer or artifact evidence. Explain why it matters in real work. Give a concrete revision task and success rubric. Limit each cycle to a few priorities so the learner can improve.